Skip to content
Sea Turtle.

Emba Hunutlu Coal Plant

Yumurtalik, Adana, Turkey

This project violates the following Banks and Biodiversity No Go Areas:

The 1,320 MW Emba Hunutlu Coal Plant is located in Yumurtalık, Turkey. Despite strong local opposition and lawsuits, the Turkish government has allowed the $1.7 billion USD project to move forward in a region already beset with numerous coal plants. Environmental studies have shown that air pollution already exceed limit values. According to the expert report of the lawsuit filed to cancel the electricity license, cancer rates have increased by 11 fold in the region between 2009-2014, which roughly correspond to the operations of nearby coal plants. As such, it is likely that the construction of the Emba Hunutlu Coal Plant will further drive environmental health impacts on the local population. The modeling, conducted by the Center for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) and the Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) reveals that air pollutant emissions from the project would likely be responsible for a projected 2,000 premature deaths in the operating life time of the plant.

In addition, the area is a biodiversity hotspot protected under the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. The area contains several reptiles, plants, and invertebrates that are classified as either under threat per the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) or endemic to this region. Endemic species are plants are animals that are only found in one geographic area. As such, they are particularly at risk to habitat changes, as any habitat loss may jeopardize their long-term survival. Yumurtalık is also the nesting area of the endangered green turtle (Chelonia mydas), and the critically endangered African softshell turtle (Trionyx triunguis). According to a recent report by the IUCN, stronger protections are needed to successfully conserve marine turtles in the Mediterranean. Endemic species include the dune cricket, and three plant species: Aleppo pine, Misis milkwitch, and the rare Hare’s ear (Bupleurum polyactis). In addition, the site contains two endangered plant species, iris xanthospuria and rumex bithynicus.

Adana/Turkey.

Concerningly, the project does not comply with current Turkish and European Environmental and Air Pollution Limits. For instance, the project violates Turkish law Circular No. 2009/10 of the Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs on the protection of sea turtles, and the 2014 measures of Turkish Industrial Air Pollution Control Regulation (SKHKKY). The project’s environmental impact assessment also contains a number of flaws and gaps. For example, although the EIA mentions assessing the cumulative impacts of air pollution in the region, it does not comprehensively report findings, nor did the EIA disclose the methodology behind the findings. Moreover, the company recently changed the stack technology of the coal plant, which should trigger an additional impact assessment. The study conducted by Turkish NGOs  HEAL and CREA indicate that the health impacts are expected to be much higher with this new stack design, considering the PM2.5 increase.

Local communities and groups not only strongly oppose the construction of not only the Emba Hunutlu Coal plant, but also any further coal project development due to the well-established negative climate, public health and social impacts. The controversy over coal has already led companies to withdraw from coal plant development in the area. For instance, in 2015 French utility Engie decided to pull out of a coal project in Iskenderun Bay due to opposition on local and international levels.

In 2017, the Hunutlu coal project was sued by civil society organizations on the basis of negative cumulative pollution impacts. Court experts ultimately accepted local organizations’ claims that the project would negatively impact public health, agriculture, and increase pollution as valid and credible. In June 2020, more than 20 Turkish NGOs called on the project’s financiers, which include China Development Bank, ICBC, and Bank of China, to withdraw from the coal plant. According to Dr. Sadun Bölükbaşı from the East Mediterranean Platform of Environment Associations, the project’s Chinese financiers bear a responsibility to ensure their loans are sustainable and beneficial to Turkish people:

“An investment at this scale needs to benefit both China and Turkey, most importantly the local communities that will bear the impacts of the coal plant. We do not believe that the project that will operate on imported coal will provide any benefit to our communities and our country due to the negative impacts on the environment, climate, and biodiversity. We demand support for clean sectors such as solar and wind which would benefit stakeholders in Turkey and China and we ask the Chinese banks to act on the basis of sustainable development and comply with China’s green financing policies”.

More Case Studies

Banks and financial institutions need to be held accountable for their role in driving biodiversity loss, fragmenting critical ecosystems, negatively impacting indigenous and traditional communities, and harming wilderness areas. These campaigns from our partners exemplify why we need banks to adopt our proposed No Go policy.